{"id":520,"date":"2012-11-12T23:48:04","date_gmt":"2012-11-12T22:48:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.svenkullander.se\/blog\/?p=520"},"modified":"2019-01-13T13:33:06","modified_gmt":"2019-01-13T12:33:06","slug":"the-artist-with-the-golden-guppy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.svenkullander.se\/blog\/2012\/11\/the-artist-with-the-golden-guppy\/","title":{"rendered":"The artist with the golden guppy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Tor<\/a>

Tor Otto Fredlin. Photo published in Akvariet, 1932. Unknown artist. Public domain.<\/p><\/div>\n

In my mildly energetic aspirations to acquire a full set of the Swedish aquarium magazine Akvariet<\/em> (1927-1988), I was fortunate to add recently the 1932 volume, which turned out to contain\u00a0 several highlights. This volume, the October issue contains a rare description of a new fish by Wilhelm Schreitm\u00fcller, naming it after the Swedish painter Tor Otto Fredlin. It is not cited in the Catalog of Fishes and Google doesn’t know about it yet, so it may be worth commenting on.<\/p>\n

Tor Otto Fredlin was born in north Sweden, in the town of H\u00e4rn\u00f6sand, 16 June 1890. After school he tested different professions and among other things assisted a a taxidermist. His inclination seems to have been toward painted more than real animals, however. He studied painting at Althin’s School of Painting<\/em> (in Swedish: Althins m\u00e5larskola) in Stockholm 1910-1912, and his first exhibition was in H\u00e4rn\u00f6sand in 1915. He moved to Lund in southern Sweden in 1920, and stayed there for the rest of his life. Fredlin never married, and he made only one trip abroad, to study art in France in 1924.\u00a0 As an artist he mainly painted nature settings with animals in focus, mostly birds, but also colourful landscapes. Most paintings seem to have been aquarels and oil paintings of small size.<\/p>\n

\"Akvariefiskar,

Fredlin’s colour plate Akvariefiskar I in Wallengren & Hanstr\u00f6m, 1939, 1948, Djurens v\u00e4rld, Fiskar. Actually a composite copied from other illustrations not in copyright.<\/p><\/div>\n

On the fish side, he made the colour illustrations for the encyclopedic Djurens v\u00e4rld<\/em> (Wallengren & Hanstr\u00f6m, 1937-1940, reprinted 1948), at least one of them depicting fishes he might have had in his own aquarium. Yes, he was also a fish keeper and fish breeder, an aquarist. I cannot find much about Fredlin as an aquarist (or even as an artist), but an idolizing article by the signature Bej in Akvariet<\/em>, 1932, may be cited in part:<\/p>\n

!… one of our country’s greatest aquarium friends. … It is Tor Otto Fredlin, the artist, “the nearsighted nature observer” as an art critic once so characterisingly expressed it. Because our friend Fredlin is a nature observer as few others! He sees everything i nature. Some things even that are secluded from us normal people. … He has the true ability to decorate his containers as cosy and attractive. It is always a pleasure to visit him and hear him speak about and describe his animals. … He shared generously from his rich knowledge. When this was so distributed in the timid way that is so particular for Fredlin, one felt his greatness and was impressed. Already in 1926 he had in addition to many egglayers a remarkably beautiful stock of mirrored golden platys, cultivated by himself. It was lost during a trip up to Norrland. But he did not despond. A lot was still in the wait. He observed our commonest fish, the guppy. Wasn’t there something to do? Couldn’t one get something exceptional out of it? And thus the thought of the yellow guppy that is now a reality had run up to his brain. Who else among us would have had the patience then to spend 7 whole years with this “inconspicuous” fish? It had to be a Fredlin! [The translation attempts to preserve some of the spirit of the original.]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Breathtaking praise. Fredlin must have been a star among aquarists. More sober, but still generously appreciative was Edvin Brorsson’s (1956) obituary. Obviously Fredlin ended his days in the autumn of 1955 as an aquarist in action, among his aquaria in his home in Lund: “He was in the middle of work with cleaning a container as he sat down to rest on a chair, and from here fell dead to the floor.”<\/p>\n

His artistic career apparently was not rocketing at any time. His paintings still sell, at modest prices, but let us remember him primarily for painting a grey fish golden, as close to an alchemical GMO one can come. One would expect Fredlin to have painted his golden guppies also in oil, but I am unaware of a colour illustration. Brorsson (1942) reproduces a drawing in monochrome halftone, presumably of a colour painting. It is a typical Fredlin scene, with half the painting empty, and the subject hovering in front of vegetation. Like Fredlin’s fish illustrations in Djurens v\u00e4rld<\/em> the drawing lacks artistic quality. Many or all of his fish drawings seem to be exact or crude reproductions of photographs. In the colour plate shown here, the Rivulus urophthalmus <\/em>(yellow top fish) and Hemigrammus ocellifer<\/em> (group of greys to the left) are exactly as on photographs in Innes (1935, pp. 112, 243), even in number and position, even the background has been copied. Presumably living aquarium fish weren’t within the artistic nearsightedness of the master.<\/p>\n

I am ignorant enough about guppies to not know if the golden guppies in the aquarium shops today are descendants of the Scanian breed. It seems likely that pigment mutations of later days may have taken the place of Fredlin’s creation. Nevertheless, at the time, this golden guppy was regarded as something very special. Edvin Brorsson, publisher of Akvariet<\/em>, <\/em>sent a batch of living goldens to Wilhelm Schreitm\u00fcller in Frankfurt, editor of the Wochenschrift f\u00fcr Aquarien- und Terrarienkunde<\/em>, and author of several books on aquarium fishes. Schreitm\u00fcller responded with an article describing the goldens as a new “variety”, naming it for Fredlin, which in its entirety reads like this when translated from Swedish to English:<\/p>\n

Lebistes reticulatus (Peters) var. Fredlini (Schreitm.)<\/strong>
\nBy Vilhelm Schreitm\u00fcller<\/em>, Frankfurt am Main<\/p>\n

A short time ago, Mr Brorsson, Malm\u00f6, sent me a fish can with some golden yellow Lebistes reticulatus (Peters)<\/em>, millionfishes or Guppi), along with a message that these were produced in culture from the typical and natural form by a Swedish aquarium friend, Mr T. O. Fredlin<\/em>, over a period of 8 years, and that the fishes nowadays leave a stable offspring. In shape those animals are typcal Lebistes reticulatus (Peters)<\/em>. The males have a length of 2-2.5 cm., the females 3-3.5 cm., all including caudal fins.<\/p>\n

On the back, the males<\/em> are dark yellow, while hindbody and caudal pedcuncle are light yellow, the latter with 2 vermilion round spots, in front of which are placed a dark and a copper red spot. One of the males sent along has a dark, white-margined dot at the base of the caudal fin. The scales on the anterior par tof the back have a faint dark margin.<\/p>\n

The females<\/em> are orange yellow on the back and on the entire hindbody with caudal peduncle. The pregnancy spot is pink red. The scales on the anterior part of the back are finely dark margined. The abdomen is yellow white.<\/p>\n

We thus have to deal with heare typical xanthoristic specimens, whose fins are transparent and seem to be equipped with a yellow cast. Pectoral and pelvic fins’s base is reddish.<\/p>\n

In recognition of the breeder and to differentiate these animals from the typical Lebistes reticulatus (Peters), I call this fish:“Lebistes reticulatus (Peters) var. Fredlini (Schreitm.)”<\/em>
\neven if xanthoristic forms “actually” should not have a distinct name (usually!) – But that even the professional zoologists make exceptions in this regard is apparent best from the names below:<\/p>\n

“Carrasius auratus (L.)” = goldfish,
\n“Tinca aurata (Cuv.)” = guldsutare,
\n“Cyprinus auratus (Mats.)” = gold carp,
\n“Platypoecilus immaculatus (Myers)” = gold platy,
\nand many others, which all of them also are only xanthoristic forms of the species in question.<\/p>\n

In the same manner certain melanotic forms of lizards, e.g., “Lacerta lilfordi maluqueurorum (Mertens)” and several others receive their particular variety names.<\/p>\n

So – why should one not then be able to give the xanthoristic form of Lebistes reticulatus (Peters<\/em>) a proper variety name? “Was dem Einen recht ist, ist dem Anderen billig”!<\/p>\n

Food, care and water temperature is for the new guppy the same as for the original species.
\n(Frankfurt am Main 10\/10\u00a0 [Italics as in the original, parentheses as in the original. PDF of original<\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A similar text, in German, was published in the Wochenschrift<\/em> in 1933 (Schreitm\u00fcller, 1933). Schreitm\u00fcller’s\u00a0 description does not make the name fredlini<\/em> available for purposes of zoological nomenclature. On the one hand,\u00a0 the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature covers names of domestic animals (e.g., Canis familiaris<\/em> for dogs), but is also expressly excludes names proposed for varieties after 1960. For names of varieties proposed before 1961, Articles 45.6.1 and 45.6.4 apply, and they exclude names given to what obviously is not a subspecies except if a later citation exists, before 1985, that uses the name for a valid species or subspecies. This may be worth looking into, but for now,\u00a0<\/em>fredlini is not going to lengthen our lists of guppy synonyms, as the name was applied explicitly on a colour form.<\/p>\n

Fredlin’s golden guppy is not the only one, and not the only one named by Schreitm\u00fcller. Already in 1934 Schreitm\u00fcller\u00a0 reported on specimens of “Goldguppy” sent alive to him and originating from German breeders in Czechoslovakia (Schreitm\u00fcller, 1934). He compared them with the Fredlin guppy, noting that the Czechoslovakian guppy lacked spots on the side and fins, and that the Fredlin guppy was more intensely golden yellow. Schreitm\u00fcller named the new form Lebistes reticulatus aurata<\/em>, noting that: “Dieser name soll nur als Unterscheidungsmerkmal dienen.” [This name must only serve as distinguishing character.] One may interpret this as meaning that Lebistes reticulatus aurata<\/em> was intented as just a category stamp and not as a scientific name. Seven specimens are preserved in the Zoological Museum in Berlin, and were listed as syntypes of of Lebistes reticulatus aurata<\/em> by Paepke & Seegers (1986), so obviously these authors considered Schreitm\u00fcller’s name available, although they identify the specimens as Poecilia reticulata<\/em>.<\/p>\n

In a later issue of the Wochenschrif<\/em>t, Franz Melecky, from Kremsier (Krom\u011b\u0159\u00ed\u017e, in the present Czech Republic), described how he discovered golden guppies in his plant breeding compound, propagated them and started distributing Goldguppy as Lebistes reticulatus aurata<\/em> from 1925 onward. Interestingly, Melecky uses the name Lebistes reticulatus fredlini<\/em> at the end of his story, speculating if a cross with the Fredlin guppy could improve on the size of his own Goldguppy, as they didn’t reach the sizes of the original stock. Does this make fredlini available? Or is this the end of the story?<\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n